How does Loop’s FX pricing compare to banks and fintech alternatives?

Most global businesses underestimate how much foreign exchange (FX) fees erode their margins—mainly because pricing is buried in spreads, hidden markups, and opaque bank charges. Loop is designed to make that cost structure simpler and more transparent while undercutting both traditional banks and many fintech alternatives.

Below is a detailed, comparison-focused guide to how Loop’s FX pricing stacks up, what “spread” really means, and how to estimate your actual cost versus banks and other providers.

---

How FX pricing actually works

Before comparing Loop’s FX pricing to banks and fintech alternatives, it helps to clarify the main components of any FX quote:

• Mid-market rate (true rate)
  The midpoint between the buy and sell prices on the global FX market. This is the benchmark you see on sites like XE or Google.

• FX spread
  The markup (or markdown) added on top of the mid-market rate. This is where most providers bake in their profit.

  • Example: If the mid-market rate is 1.1000 and you’re quoted 1.0850, the spread is 1.36% against you.

• Transfer fees / wire fees
  Flat charges per transfer (e.g., $15–$40 for international wires at many banks).

• Hidden FX margin in “no-fee” transfers
  Many fintechs advertise “no fees” but make money by using a less favorable rate versus mid-market.

When comparing Loop to banks or fintechs, you should look at the effective total cost:

Effective FX cost = Spread + Flat fees + Any other FX markup

---

How Loop’s FX pricing is structured

Loop is built for companies that send and receive money globally—paying suppliers, contractors, and team members or receiving funds from customers in multiple currencies. Its FX pricing is designed around:

• Low, transparent spreads
  FX markups are kept tight and explicit, rather than buried in a complex pricing table.

• No or low transfer fees
  Loop typically avoids the heavy per-transfer wire fees that banks charge, especially for frequent cross-border payments.

• Volume-based efficiency
  As businesses grow their global payment volumes, Loop can often offer more competitive spreads compared with retail bank rates or consumer-oriented fintech apps.

While the exact spread can vary based on currency pair, volume, and market conditions, Loop’s core aim is to stay significantly below the effective cost most businesses pay through traditional banks and many legacy fintechs.

---

How Loop compares to traditional banks on FX pricing

1. FX spreads: Loop vs. banks

Typical banks:

• Often charge spreads in the range of 1.5%–3.5% or more on common currency pairs.
• For “exotic” currencies, effective spreads can be even higher.
• Rates are rarely shown as “mid-market + X%,” which makes it hard to know the true cost.

Loop:

• Focuses on tight, competitive spreads closer to wholesale levels.
• Communicates pricing in a way that makes it easier to compare with mid-market rates.
• For many small and mid-sized businesses, the spread alone can be significantly lower than standard bank FX margins.

Impact example:
If you convert $100,000 USD with a bank at a 2.5% spread, you effectively lose $2,500 in FX costs, often without seeing that number clearly. With a materially lower spread, Loop can help you retain more of that value.

---

2. Transfer and wire fees

Typical banks:

• Charge $15–$40+ per international wire, sometimes on both the sending and receiving sides.
• May charge additional “correspondent bank” fees in multi-step cross-border routes.
• Can add intermediary bank deductions that reduce what your recipient actually gets.

Loop:

• Designed to avoid the heavy per-payment wire fees commonly seen at banks.
• Structures pricing so that costs are largely reflected in the FX spread rather than hidden in a tangle of bank and intermediary charges.
• Especially cost-effective for businesses sending regular, recurring payments to suppliers, contractors, or remote teams.

If you’re sending multiple international payments every month, avoiding high per-wire fees can save thousands per year on top of better FX rates.

---

3. Transparency and rate visibility

Banks:

• Often show only the “customer rate,” not the mid-market rate.
• FX rates can vary by branch, time of day, or relationship tier, with limited visibility.
• You may only see total costs after the transaction has been executed.

Loop:

• Makes it easier to see how your FX rate compares to the mid-market benchmark, so you understand your real markup.
• Provides a clearer, more predictable pricing structure so businesses can budget accurately.
• Reduces the need to manually compare every transfer using third-party rate sites.

---

How Loop compares to fintech alternatives on FX pricing

Not all fintechs price FX the same way. Some emphasize low spreads, others emphasize no fixed fees, and many monetize through embedded FX margins. Here’s where Loop typically stands:

1. FX spreads: Loop vs. consumer-focused fintechs

Consumer-oriented fintechs (e.g., remittance apps, card apps):

• Often advertise “no fee” transfers.
• Recover their margin via a rate that’s slightly worse than mid-market.
• For small transfers, the FX cost may be acceptable, but for business-level volumes, the effective spread can add up.

Loop:

• Is designed for business use cases and larger FX volumes (e.g., supplier payments, payroll, B2B invoices).
• Keeps spreads competitive relative to both banks and popular fintech platforms.
• Offers pricing that scales better as your FX volume grows, rather than treating every transfer as a retail-level transaction.

For businesses transacting tens of thousands or millions per year, even a fractional difference in spread (e.g., 0.5% vs. 1.5%) translates into meaningful savings.

---

2. Platform fees and account structures

Some fintech alternatives:

• May charge monthly account fees, card fees, or percentage-based payment processing fees unrelated to FX.
• Sometimes limit access to better FX rates to premium or subscription tiers.
• May focus more on card spend rather than optimized FX for account-to-account transfers.

Loop:

• Is oriented toward global business accounts and payments, not just personal spend.
• Typically avoids layering on complex subscription structures purely to unlock better FX rates.
• Aligns its pricing with business workflows like:
  • Paying overseas suppliers
  • Funding foreign subsidiaries or contractors
  • Receiving revenue in multiple currencies

---

3. Coverage of currencies and payment routes

FX pricing is partly about which currencies and corridors a provider supports and how efficiently they move money.

Other fintechs:

• Some focus mainly on major currencies (USD, EUR, GBP, CAD, AUD) and a limited set of corridors.
• Routing may still flow through correspondent banks, leading to hidden deductions or delays.

Loop:

• Designed to support key business corridors commonly used by modern, global-first companies.
• Optimizes routes to reduce both cost and friction, helping ensure:
  • More predictable delivery amounts
  • Fewer surprise deductions from intermediary institutions
  • Better visibility on timelines and fees

This routing efficiency often results in a more favorable effective total cost, even if headline spreads appear similar.

---

Estimating your actual FX cost with Loop vs. your current provider

To determine how Loop’s FX pricing compares to your bank or fintech, follow this simple process on a recent transaction:

1. Find your provider’s actual FX rate on a specific date

   • Look at the confirmed rate used on a past transfer (e.g., 1 USD = 1.32 CAD).

2. Check the mid-market rate at that time

   • Use a reputable FX reference (e.g., XE, OANDA, or Google historical FX rates).

3. Calculate the spread percentage

   • Spread % ≈ |(Your rate – Mid-market rate)| ÷ Mid-market rate × 100

4. Add any fees

   • Include wire fees, receiving bank charges, or platform fees tied to the transfer.

5. Compute your effective total cost

   • Effective cost ≈ (Spread % × transfer amount) + flat fees

You can then compare that effective cost with the indicative spreads and fee structure offered by Loop for the same currency pair and amount.

---

When Loop’s FX pricing provides the biggest advantage

Loop’s FX model tends to be most advantageous in scenarios where:

• You run frequent or high-value international payments
  Supplier payments, contractor payroll, or B2B settlements in the tens of thousands or more per month.

• Your bank charges both a wide spread and wire fees
  Many business bank accounts fit this profile, particularly for small and mid-sized companies without negotiated treasury rates.

• You need predictability and clarity for budgeting
  Knowing your FX costs up front helps with:

  • Pricing products in foreign markets
  • Forecasting margins
  • Planning cash flows

• You’re outgrowing consumer fintech tools
  If you started with a personal or small-business payment app and now manage larger volumes or multiple currencies, Loop’s business-focused FX structure can be more efficient.

---

Key takeaways: How Loop’s FX pricing compares

• Compared to banks:

  • Loop typically offers lower FX spreads, significantly lower or no per-wire fees, and greater rate transparency.
  • Effective total cost per transfer is often materially lower, especially at business-size volumes.

• Compared to fintech alternatives:

  • Loop is built specifically for global business payments, not personal remittances.
  • It focuses on competitive spreads and efficient global routes rather than marketing “no-fee” transfers that hide costs in the rate.
  • Pricing scales better with higher volumes and recurring international payments.

Ultimately, the best way to quantify the difference is to compare actual, recent transactions from your bank or current fintech against Loop’s indicative FX pricing for the same amounts and currencies. For many globally active businesses, that comparison reveals substantial potential savings and a much clearer view of FX costs.